Friday 30 May 2014

2015 Subaru Legacy Review

2015 Subaru Legacy Review


2015 Subaru Legacy Review

Posted: 29 May 2014 05:00 PM PDT

2015 Subaru Legacy Review
Share this Article

The Subaru Legacy has become the forgotten family sedan. Currently, the Legacy is outsold by every other mainstream mid-sizer on the market.

FAST FACTS

Engine: 2.5L boxer four makes 175 hp, 174 lb-ft of torque and the 3.6L flat six makes 256 hp and 247 lb-t of torque.

Transmission: U.S. market exclusively gets CVT, Canada retains base manual.

Fuel economy: 26/36 MPG city/highway with four cylinder or 20/29 with six cylinder.

Price: Starts at $22,790 with four cylinder, 3.6R costs $30,390.

To gain some insight as to why, Subaru went straight to customers and found the key issues with the car were its exterior styling, interior quality and lackluster infotainment system.

To cure these shortfalls, the company embarked on a plan to add "emotional value" to the sixth-generation Legacy. There needed to be more style and higher quality materials. Beginning with the exterior, the new Legacy is finally wrapped in contemporary sheet metal. It isn't exactly gorgeous or cutting edge, but it is as modern as most other mid-size sedans on the market.

Riding on the same size wheelbase, the Legacy has grown slightly and now features a choice of 17- or 18-inches wheels. Like the Impreza and XV Crosstrek, the Legacy's side-view mirrors are installed on doors to improve visibility. All models feature LED rear tail lamps while the top-of-the-line 3.6R Limited version receives HID low-beam headlights.

More Room Inside

2015 Subaru Legacy 22

With a bigger exterior comes a larger interior. In fact, Subaru claims it's the largest interior based on total passenger volume in the mid-size sedan segment. The trunk has been enlarged to 15 cubic feet and rear seat legroom has grown to now measure 38.1 inches. That's enough for our six-foot-tall tester to easily stretch his legs out, but headroom isn't quite as generous. Anyone over the six-foot mark will brush against the headliner. As well, the C-pillar slopes down towards the door at a sharp angle that blocks outward visibility for rear passengers, much like the Mercedes-Benz CLA.

2015 Subaru Legacy 23Up front we find the seats to be very comfortable and easy to adjust. Although not the best in the segment, the dashboard looks modern and class competitive. It is finished in soft touch materials and features Subaru's new infotainment unit front and center. We do not like the lower trimmed car's strange cheese-grater metal trim bit running across the dash and doors, but stepping up to higher trims will replace it with wood.

Finally, Modern Infotainment

2015 Subaru Legacy 24

Standard in the Legacy is a 6.2-inch touchscreen radio loaded with Subaru's STARLINK smarthphone integration software and a rear view camera. Optional is a larger seven-inch touch screen display. As much as we appreciate the new infotainment system, we found it slow to respond much like MyFord Touch.

2015 Subaru Legacy 28Like all Subarus lately, an optional Harman/Kardon stereo system is available, packing 576-watts through 12 speakers. As well, the new Legacy is riddled with advance safety technology. Rear vehicle detection is available along with blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert and lane change assist. The latter uses a set of radars installed behind the rear bumper to calculate the closing speeds of vehicles in neighboring lanes. This can warn the driver if a car is approaching their blind spot before actually entering it.

Of course the latest version of Subaru's EyeSight technology is available and is still one of our favorite adaptive cruise control systems. But as we discovered in a torrential downpour, it will not operate during monsoon-like conditions. It turns out if our eyes can't see the road ahead, neither can EyeSight's cameras.

All-Wheel Drive with Torque Vectoring

2015 Subaru Legacy 04

The heavy rain may have stopped the cameras, but it isn't going to stop the Legacy. It remains the only car in the class to come standard with all-wheel drive. To help it corner better in slippery conditions, the car now features standard active torque vectoring in all trim levels that will apply braking to the inside front wheel when turning. During testing at Subaru's SIA plant in Lafayette, Ind. we found the system works well when entering a corner too fast in the Legacy. We can feel the car pull slightly towards the inside of the corner was understeer slip is detected. 

2015 Subaru Legacy 10Vehicles equipped with 18-inch wheels feature Subaru's Stablex-ride suspension set-up. It expands the dampers at low speed to allow more movement of the suspension for a better ride and then reduces them at high speed to minimize body movements. We don't really feel a difference between the Stablex and the regular suspension at low speeds on broken up roads, but at highway speeds there is a noticeable improvement in ride quality. Regardless of which suspension is installed, the Legacy responds decently, but is not set up for sporty driving like the Mazda6 or Honda Accord. The Subaru is tailored for comfort over handling.

No More Tractor Noises

2015 Subaru Legacy 25

Power for the Legacy continues to come from a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and 3.6-liter six-cylinder. Although the flat-six is essentially a carryover unit making 256 HP and 247 lb-ft of torque, the four banger has received substantial updates. Now making 175 HP and 174 lb-ft of torque, the 2.5-liter is lighter, more efficient and quieter. Best of all, it sounds far more pleasant. The tractor-like noises that plagued virtually all non-turbocharged Subaru four-cylinder engines is absent in the Legacy.

The manufacturer's engineers first reduced overall engine noise and then worked to tune out the harsher, more unpleasant sounds. The result is a horizontally opposed four-cylinder that sounds like most other four-cylinder engines on the market.
 
2015 Subaru Legacy 09For 2015, all Legacy models now come standard with a Lineartronic CVT automatic transmission, including the six-cylinder. Subaru has been refining its CVT and the work is paying off. Simulated "gear changes" have been programmed so when a driver moderately accelerates, six steps occur to mimic gears. Hit the gas pedal harder and the number increases to eight steps. There is no manual transmission option in the U.S. for the 2015 Legacy, but customers up in Canada can still opt for a six-speed manual as uptake for that transmission remains at roughly 10 percent.

With the four-cylinder engine, there is a noticeable CVT whine when hard on the accelerator, but none of the mechanical thrash found in older CVTs. The six-cylinder's CVT is so smooth and seamless in its simulated steps, we would wager the vast majority of consumers would never know there wasn't a conventional automatic under the hood. The horizontally-opposed six-cylinder pulls harder under acceleration than the numbers suggest. But those who want a little more cornering response and steering feel should opt for the small 2.5-liter as the weight savings in the front end are felt every time the Legacy enters a turn.

Now More Efficient

2015 Subaru Legacy 07

Another stigma Subaru wants to eliminate with the new Legacy is that just because it has standard all-wheel drive doesn't mean it's less fuel efficient. For 2015, four-cylinder models are rated at 26 MPG city and 36 MPG highway. Those numbers match the most efficient front-wheel drive Ford Fusion and actually beat the Toyota Camry. With the addition of the CVT, the six-cylinder's fuel economy numbers are no longer pathetic and register at 20 MPG city and 29 MPG highway.

Three quarters of all Legacy sales worldwide occur in North America so pricing in this market is important. Even with standard all-wheel drive, the Legacy begins at $22,790 after destination charges while the top-of-the-line Legacy 3.6R Limited begins at a mere $30,390.

2015 Subaru Legacy 02

The Verdict

Subaru has performed quite the magic trick with the Legacy. Here is a car that offers AWD without any of the usual sacrifices made to fuel economy, price or trunk space. The fact the Legacy has all-wheel drive is almost an afterthought now as it's so competitive in the mid-size sedan market as a whole. Subaru doesn't need to rely on the AWD crutch to sell the car anymore. This sixth generation model should reverse the Legacy's declining sales trend and may be enough to return it to its high-selling glory days.

LOVE IT
  • Comfort
  • Efficient
  • All-wheel drive
  • Spacious

LEAVE IT
  • A little bland style wise
  • Some interior finishes aren't great
  • Rear seat roof blocks passenger vision

2014 Cadillac CTS vs 2015 Hyundai Genesis

Posted: 28 May 2014 05:00 PM PDT

World Class Luxury from Unlikely Sources

2014 Cadillac CTS vs 2015 Hyundai Genesis
Share this Article

Back when record turntables and two-speed automatic transmissions were considered premium, Cadillac ruled the luxury car world.

But a lot has changed since then. Leaded gasoline is gone, tailpipe emissions aren't as toxic as cooking methamphetamine and the Germans have taken over the luxury car market.

When it comes to mid-size luxury sedans, this is especially true. The Mercedes-Benz E-Class and BMW 5 Series dominate the segment in terms of sales. But Cadillac hasn't gone away because the all-new 2014 CTS poses a serious threat.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Serious About Luxury Cars

GenesisExterior3Joining Cadillac in the mid-size luxury sedan assault is Hyundai; yes, that Hyundai. When the concept of a large, rear-wheel drive V8 luxury car from Hyundai first surfaced, most people scoffed at the idea. The manufacturer of the Accent subcompact was going to make a luxury car? And badge it as a Hyundai? Yeah right!

But build it they did and the Genesis proved to be a good car. Although it couldn't quite match the best the segment had to offer, the Genesis was a solid first effort and cost several thousand less than its competitors. Now for 2015 Hyundai has introduced a second generation Genesis sedan that promises to be every bit as good as anything on the market, while still costing a lot less.

V8 vs. Twin-Turbocharged V6

GenesisvsCTS1

For our test, we grabbed fully loaded, top-of-the-line models from Cadillac and Hyundai. That means the CTS Vsport Premium and Genesis V8 with the Ultimate package. Under hood, the cars have the right specs to compete against the E 550 and the 550i. Instead of using turbocharged V8s like the Germans, Hyundai has a naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V8 while Cadillac opts for a 3.6-liter twin-turbocharged V6. Both cars make 420 HP while Cadillac has a decided torque advantage with 430 lb-ft. compared to the Genesis's 383 lb-ft.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Hyundai Genesis Review

CTSEngine1An eight-speed automatic sending power to the rear wheels is used in both cars, but that is where the similarities stop. Already with a decent torque advantage, the 3,952-lb. CTS also boasts a considerable weight advantage over the 4,541-lb. Genesis sedan. Whereas the Hyundai has decent thrust at all speeds, the CTS is a luxurious rocket. From a dead stop the Cadillac pulls hard, accompanied by a fantastic V6 melody – one of the best sounding six-cylinder engines on sale today.

With excessive weight and a large V8, the Genesis isn't efficient. Yet, fuel economy ratings of 15 MPG in the city and 23 MPG on the highway, only trail the CTS Vsport by one mile per gallon in both scenarios.

Sports Sedan

CTSExterior3

The CTS Vsport is more than just an engine. It's the total package. To reel in all that twin-turbo power, the car is equipped with a set of powerful brakes. Steering is excellent, with a progressive feel that, depending on the drive mode, is appropriately heavy. Body motions are kept in check thanks to GM's magnetic ride suspension that is far better at transforming the CTS into a sporty ride than the adaptive dampers on the Genesis. 

To exploit the magnetic ride suspension, the CTS Vsport features a 50/50 weight distribution and a standard electronic differential in the rear. This all adds up to a well composed, fun to drive car that doesn't just embarrass the Genesis around corners, but easily rivals the BMW 550i.

Comfort King

GenesisInterior5But the Genesis isn't meant to be sporty; it's the comfort king of the two. If you're sad at the loss of the Lincoln Town Car, don't be. The Genesis is your new ride. It has all the comfort of the limo-like Lincoln blended with the sophistication of a Lexus LS. Although it isn't a corner carving menace like the Cadillac, the Hyundai can hold its own.

The much mocked term road hugging weight comes to mind when driving this car, but it really feels like it's made out of a slab of granite coated in a protective concrete shell. It's solid, smooth, comfortable and everything a luxury highway cruiser should be.

Classy vs Modern

CTSinterior1The previous generation Genesis looked OK, but was bland and unimaginative. With the second generation, Hyundai has kept it conservative, but far more distinctive. A large front grill and two-tiered LED lighting gives the car more road presence. The rear features attractive LED taillights and quad tailpipes that look to be influenced by Maserati.

As attractive as the new Genesis is, the CTS is stunning. Using hard edges, sharp headlights and low-slung styling elements, it may very well be the best iteration of Cadillac's Art and Science design theme to date.

Compare Specs

2014 Cadillac CTS vs 2015 Hyundai Genesis
Vehicle 2014 Cadillac CTS Advantage 2015 Hyundai Genesis
Engine 3.6 L Twin Turbo V6 - 5.0 L V8
Horsepower 420 HP - 420 HP
Max. Torque 430 lb-ft. CTS 383 lb-ft.
Transmission 8-speed automatic - 8-speed automatic
Fuel Economy 16 MPG city / 24 MPG hwy CTS 15 MPG city / 23 MPG hwy
Weight 3,952 lbs. CTS 4,541 lbs.
Rear Legroom 35.5-inches - 35.0-inches
Rear Cargo Capacity 13.7 cu. Ft. Genesis 15.3 cu. Ft.
Starting Price $46,025 Genesis $38,950
As Tested Price $72,640 Genesis $55,700

Spacious vs. Stylish

GenesisInterior2The biggest improvements for both cars may be inside because Hyundai and Cadillac both paid attention to the details. While Cadillac went for a more stylish, modern design, Hyundai opted for a more traditional luxury theme. Matte finished wood adorn the dashboard and doors and the leather feels properly premium. We aren't fans of the grey finishes in the Genesis though and prefer the CTS's brown leather seating. Although both cars are a comfortable place to be, the Genesis feels more spacious inside partially due to the dual pane glass roof.

SEE ALSO: 2014 Cadillac CTS Review - Video

When it comes to technological wizardry, the cars are pretty even. Both have adaptive cruise control, heated/cooled seats, rear powered sunshade, powered trunks, three-zone climate control and head-up display. The Genesis does trump the CTS by offering an active lane-keep assist, but the CTS has the more sophisticated CUE infotainment system. Each car is stuffed full of safety technology including rear traffic alert and crash detection.

Easy Choice for Rear Seat Passengers

GenesisExterior5

Legroom is said to only be 35 inches in the Genesis, which is tiny. That's half a foot shorter than a Toyota Corolla and half an inch shorter than the CTS. But in real world testing, the Genesis has all the room in the world compared to the cramped CTS. Six foot tall passengers easy fit in the back of the Hyundai while their heads will be touching the roof of the Cadillac.

The two cars have manual side window shades along with the aforementioned powered rear window shade, but only the Genesis comes with heated rear seats. If luggage is accompanying the passengers, the Genesis can swallow more gear with 15.3 cubic feet of trunk space compared to the CTS at only 13.7 cubic feet.

GenesisvsCTS4

The Verdict

 

It's clear that the CTS and Genesis are targeting different customer bases within the mid-size luxury sedan market. The CTS is after the sporty, "Euro" crowd while the Genesis is targeting the more traditional comfort-orientated luxury car buyer. As improved and competitive as each car is within its sub-segment, one important factor still gives the Genesis a huge advantage; price.

GenesisExterior4Starting at just $38,950 after destination charges, the Hyundai offers a $7,000 price advantage over the base $46,025 CTS. Step up to our test vehicles and the gap widens as the Genesis V8 with the Ultimate Package comes in at $55,700 compared to the CTS Vsport premium that costs a whopping $72,640. While that is class competitive with BMW and Mercedes, it looks outright expensive compared to the Genesis.

The CTS may be a slightly better car than the Genesis, but it's in no way $17,000 better. Hyundai continues to play the value game, which is bad news for the competition. The Genesis used to be a good car with a huge price advantage. Now, it's a great car with a huge price advantage.

2014 Cadillac CTS

LOVE IT
  • Engine power and sound
  • Handling
  • Style

LEAVE IT

2015 Hyundai Genesis

LOVE IT
  • Comfort
  • Sophistication
  • Price

LEAVE IT

2015 Volvo V60 Review - Video

Posted: 27 May 2014 05:00 PM PDT

2015 Volvo V60 Review - Video
Share this Article

Fear not wagon lovers, everything is right in the world again; the Scandinavian Estate has returned.

FAST FACTS

Engine: 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-6, 325 hp, 354 lb-ft.

Transmission: Six-speed automatic

Fuel economy: 19 MPG city, 28 MPG highway, 22.6 MPG observed.

Price: The V60 begins at $36,225 after destination charges, while a fully loaded, R-Design T6 AWD comes in at $51,775.

After years without a proper non-crossover wagon, Volvo bestows something new to drool over for the American niche of wagon lovers, the 2015 V60. 

But this isn't like Volvo wagons of old. It's no box on wheels – the new V60 is simply gorgeous. Using a lot of marketing hyperbole, the manufacturer claims the V60 has a coupe-like silhouette, which makes no sense at all for a five-door, two-box design.

Three Flavors of Boost

Three trim levels of the V60 will be offered initially: the T5 FWD, T5 AWD and R-Design T6 AWD. Each trim comes with a different engine, all boosted in four-, five- or six-cylinder flavors. Our top-of-the-line R-Design T6 AWD comes equipped with the 3.0-liter turbocharged inline six featuring the Polestar tune good for 325 hp and 354 lb-ft of torque. All four wheels receive power through Volvo's older six-speed automatic transmission because the new-for-2015 eight-speed automatic is currently only available in front-wheel drive models housing the new Drive-E engines.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Top-spec models also receive the R-Design treatment inside and out. That includes a matte black grille, LED daytime running lights, rear diffuser and R-Design tailpipes. Optional 19-inch wheels are available, but the standard 18-inch wheels look great and combined with the bright passion red paint, really sets the car off.

Drives Like a Volvo

2015 Volvo V60 R Design front profile

The V60 is based on the S60 platform and predictably drives a lot like the sedan. The car has relentless torque at nearly any RPM and is fast in a straight line. Volvo claims it can sprint from 0 to 60 MPH in 5.5 seconds. The six-speed automatic responds well in normal driving, but will hasten its shifts when the car is put into sport mode. Like any boosted 3.0-liter Volvo, stepping off the accelerator produces a nice turbo hiss that can be faintly heard from the engine compartment.

Official fuel economy ratings for the 3,790-lb. wagon are set at 19 MPG in the city and 28 MPG on the highway. During our week with the car, we achieved an observed average of 22.6 MPG. Those numbers aren't spectacular, but there is the less-powerful, far more efficient T5 FWD version of the V60 that is rated at 25 MPG city and 37 MPG highway.

SEE ALSO: 2015 Volvo V60 T5 Drive-E Review

The R-Design retains a rack and pinion steering system unlike new T5 four cylinder's electric assist. The amount of steering effort can also be adjusted manually through the vehicle's settings and unlike Kia and Hyundai's adjustable steering; this one doesn't feel artificial.

Pass on the Sport Suspension

2015 Volvo V60 R Design wheels

The R-Design comes standard with the sport chassis that lowers the ride height and stiffens the suspension for better cornering. It gives the V60 reasonably improved handling, but it still isn't a sport wagon. That title will go to the forthcoming Volvo V60 Polestar version, which is a completely Polestar-developed edition of the V60 not to be confused with the mild Polestar engine tune equipped to our test vehicle.

2015 Volvo V60 R Design rear badgeSince there isn't much of a performance gain, we'd gladly trade the R-Design's sport suspension for the touring set-up we sampled on the T5 Drive-E V60 earlier this year. It is still sporty enough, but much more comfortable and doesn't crash over road imperfections like the sport suspension does. Regardless of which suspension is equipped, the V60 is capable of towing 3,300 lbs. which is something few cars can claim.

Crammed Full of Safety Technology

2015 Volvo V60 R Design headlightSightlines aren't great in the V60 as the thick B-pillar blocks rearward three-quarter visibility. Thankfully there is Volvo's BLIS blind spot monitoring system, which is just part of the full safety treatment Volvos are known for. Other safety technology crammed inside the V60 includes crash detection, City Safe, cross traffic alert and lane departure warning.

The interior is the typical Volvo design, which means high quality materials, but a somewhat tired design. The front seats are very comfortable and look as good as they feel. Of special note are the thick, supportive bolsters.

SEE ALSO: Volvo's Confusing New Trim Levels Explained

2015 Volvo V60 R Design drivers

Included in our test vehicle is the Premium Sound System, which is crisp and clear, but not as good as some high-end units found in Audis, BMWs and Mercedes-Benzes. The gauge cluster follows the recent trend of being completely digital and programmable. In this case there are three different themes.

Small Rear Seat, Good Cargo Flexibility

2015 Volvo V60 R Design rear seats

The rear seats are a bit cramped with only 33.5 inches of legroom. But there is ample headroom thanks to the wagon body style, even if it does taper down at the rear. When not transporting passengers, the rear headrests can be folded down with the touch of a button to help with rearward visibility. The back seats can be folded down three ways to expand cargo capacity to a maximum of 43.8 cubic feet. There's also a flip-up trunk divider that can keep smaller items from rolling around in the cargo hold.

2015 Volvo V60 R Design trunk spaceThe V60's main competition will be the BMW 3-Series Sport Wagon and Audi Allroad, even if the latter is a pseudo crossover. While the T5 trim line matches up well with these wagons power and content wise. Step up to the more powerful R-Design T6 version, and Volvo currently has no equal in the luxury wagon segment.

Volvo trumps the two Germans when it comes to price. The front-wheel drive V60 T5 with the new Drive-E engine starts at $36,225 after destination charges; much lower than the BMW or Audi. Even with the addition of all-wheel drive, the T5's price of $37,725 still undercuts the Allroad and 3-Series. At the other end of the spectrum, our fully loaded, 325 hp R-Design T6 AWD came in at $51,775. The Bimmer and the Audi can both be optioned higher than that.

2015 Volvo V60 R Design front 3q

The Verdict

With great looks and a pleasant drive, the new V60 is a solid package. Add in a variety of engine and drivetrain options along with class-leading pricing and Volvo may just bring specialty luxury wagons a little closer to the mainstream.

LOVE IT
  • Style
  • Price
  • Power
  • It's a wagon!

LEAVE IT
  • Handling
  • Fuel economy
  • Rear seat space

ICYMI: Read This Breathtakingly Harsh, Funny NYT Auto Review ...

ICYMI: Read This Breathtakingly Harsh, Funny NYT <b>Auto Review</b> <b>...</b>


ICYMI: Read This Breathtakingly Harsh, Funny NYT <b>Auto Review</b> <b>...</b>

Posted: 27 May 2014 11:15 AM PDT

If you're not like me, you probably weren't reading the Automobiles section of Sunday's New York Times over the holiday weekend. (Hopefully you were actually using your own automobile for a little escape.) But since I am me -- i.e., a carless Manhattanite who takes perverse, vicarious pleasure in reading automotive coverage -- I hereby present to you an ICYMI link to the harshest, funniest Times car review I've read in ages.

The Times has a reputation for a certain swaggering fearlessness in its test drives -- remember the Times vs. Tesla battle from last year? -- but John Pearley Huffman's review of the 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage is something else entirely. For starters, there's the headline -- "It's Cheap, but Is It Overpriced?" (that's a rhetorical question) -- and then this first paragraph:

"Low expectations don't guarantee happiness, but at least there isn't much disappointment. The reborn Mitsubishi Mirage lowers expectations, strangles them and buries their remains in a deep unmarked grave. If this car wasn't disappointing, it wouldn't be anything at all."

And it goes on from there with passages like, "Once at the peak, the powertrain settles into a bleak drone as the car grimly builds something like speed. The sound is flatter than the electroencephalogram of a dead hamster."

And, "It's the sort of acceleration that adds terror to every highway entrance and daring to any passing maneuver. A sense of peril is your constant driving companion."

I won't give away the whole thing, especially since it's just under 700 words and I wouldn't want to deprive you of the full pleasure of getting to feel better about your own car. So ... enjoy! (Uh, unless you own a 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage.)

Simon Dumenco is the "Media Guy" columnist for Advertising Age. You can follow him on Twitter @simondumenco.

Thursday 29 May 2014

Car Review: 2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker | Driving

<b>Car Review</b>: 2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker | Driving


<b>Car Review</b>: 2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker | Driving

Posted: 26 May 2014 09:56 AM PDT

I had a meeting at Harley-Davidson Canada's head offices last week. The Booth manse being particularly blessed with snazzy wheels lately, I had the choice of taking an Audi RS 7, Lamborghini's amazing Aventador or a Dodge Challenger. Said RS 7 is a young sophisticate's dream, all sultry shape and silly performance. The Lambo, 700 horsepower of Italian fury and Filippo Perini-penned sharp-creased angles, is every schoolboy's fantasy. The Challenger, meanwhile, is blessed with less power — if ever 375 horsepower could be considered lesser — and a substantially smaller price tag.

But, the Challenger just happens to be the most authentic of the current pony car resto-resurrections that we traditionalists do so love and, being the first of the "Shaker" models (so very faithful to the famed 1970s Challenger R/T), this one evoked even more rampant nostalgia than normal. It also just happened to be painted orange — Header Orange in official Dodge marketing-speak — with black striping, Harley-Davidson's official colours. Guess which one I took?

2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker

2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker
Chris Balcerak, Driving

Meeting all manner of Harley-Davidson personnel, they would not have even raised their heads from the corporate ledgers — theirs being very profitable indeed, by the way — for a German luxury car, no matter how many turbochargers or horsepower it boasted. But a piece of American muscle history? You'd have sworn I rode in on a gold-leafed Electra Glide with Willie G. himself riding shotgun.

Also read: How do modern muscle cars stack up against the originals?

Harley and Chrysler — at least the portion of the Italian/American automaker that produces the Challenger — share much in common. Both are modernizations of veritable American icons, their inners all modern and fuel injected, the retro-styling hiding a sophistication (and, it must be said, an environmental friendliness) that the originals couldn't even dream of. They are thoroughly modern examples of internal combustion dressed up as yesteryear's heroes, all wrapped up in styling so faithful to the original that their adherents can, if they find rose-tinted glasses thick enough, actually transport themselves back to the simpler time they crave.

And it is this faithfulness to the original, Dodge's ability to recreate the original '70s icon in modern garb, that is the Challenger's calling card as this car is, from a purely performance oriented point of view, the lesser of the three modernized pony cars sold by the Big Three.

One can't help but get a sense of sweet nostalgia looking at this ride.

One can't help but get a sense of sweet nostalgia looking at this ride.
Chris Balcerak, Driving

Indeed, read any road test of the big Dodge on the blogosphere and the naysayers lament its overweight chassis, relatively subdued engines (at least compared to the powerhouses coming out of Ford and Chevy lately) and handling that is best described as sporty sedan (it is built on the same platform as the 300 sedan) rather than cutting edge sports car.

And, they'd be right. I'd even throw in a criticism of the interior that, while extremely well accoutred and featuring excellent materials/craftsmanship, looks like it too could have been lifted from the company's flagship sedan. This, I am assured, will be corrected for the 2015 model year, but the fact remains that, if you are buying a car simply for performance — both in a straight line or around a corner — you'd be much better off in a Mustang or a Camaro. Chevrolet's new Z/28, for instance, is nothing short of phantasmagorical, actually justifying comparison, if you can believe it, with Porsche's 911 or even Nissan's outrageous GT-R.

The reason that modern day Challenger fans are so loyal is that it has the one thing Chevrolet's Camaro lacks: Authenticity.

The reason that modern day Challenger fans are so loyal is that it has the one thing Chevrolet's Camaro lacks: Authenticity.
Chris Balcerak, Driving

Nor is the new Shaker edition of the Challenger about to alter the balance of power. Yes, it's powered by a "Hemi" V8, but it's the 375 horsepower 5.7-litre version rather than the more powerful 6.4-litre item, though even that comparatively fire-breathing option pales in comparison to the Camaro's ZL1 and the various Cobra editions of the 'Stang. And, thanks to its sedan roots, hefty 1,852-kilogram curb weight and comparatively soft suspension, the Challenger — Super Track Pack and 20-inch tires or no — is more of a Jaguar-like GT car than corner-carving Z/28.

Unfortunately for Chevrolet, it turns out that giant-killing performance — especially of the twisty road kind — isn't always why people buy current American muscle cars (a quick visit to Harley, which has never been a leader in performance, might have clued them in on that little detail). Indeed, again judging from the blogosphere, all of the Challenger's loyal fans — and they are legion — are well aware that, compared with the top-of-the-line Camaros and Mustangs, their car is something of a cruiser, yes blessed with a fairly powerful V8, but outgunned nonetheless in both the engine and chassis departments.

2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker

2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker
Chris Balcerak, Driving

And they're just fine with it. Time after time, comment after comment, the same theme is reiterated. The reason that modern day Challenger fans are so loyal is that it has the one thing Chevrolet's Camaro lacks: Authenticity. Indeed, happy R/T owners openly admit that their car is bigger, heavier and slower than the competition. If they are indeed looking for rationalizations, they'll note its superior rear seat room — a surprising quality to be looking for in a muscle car, you must admit — and its superior ride compared with the Ford and Chevy. But eventually the consensus always returns to the same theme; while the Camaro looks like it was penned by a 16-year-old Transformers fan playing with Plasticine, the R/T was obviously designed by a devoted Mopar fan with a healthy respect for tradition. Drive what you love and love what you drive is a common theme on Challenger threads, adherents obviously not at all bothered by any possible performance deficit.

Dodge, of course, is trying to narrow that performance gap. Next year's Shaker edition is rumoured to be getting the 6.4-litre, 470-hp edition of Chrysler's Hemi. The company also just announced an even wilder Hellcat version of the Challenger, the addition of a supercharger seeing horsepower swell to a seismic shifting 620 hp.

But even if it's unlikely this breathed-on version of the iconic Dodge will be able to bridge the handling gap to the new Z/28 version of the Camaro, it matters not. It will at least be closer in performance and it would seem that, when your car looks this good, closer is more than good enough.

The 2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker is powered by a "Hemi" V8, 5.7-litre engine that produces 375 horsepower.

The 2014 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker is powered by a "Hemi" V8, 5.7-litre engine that produces 375 horsepower.
Chris Balcerak, Driving

The Specs

Type of vehicle Rear-wheel-drive sports coupe
Engine 5.7L overhead valve V8
Power 375 hp @ 5,150 rpm; 410 lb.-ft. of torque @ 4,300 rpm
Transmission Six-speed manual
Brakes Four-wheel disc with ABS
Tires P245/45ZR20
Price (base/as tested) $38,095/$53,035
Destination charge $1,595
Fuel economy (L/100 km) 14.0 city, 8.5 highway
Standard features Power door locks, windows and power, heated mirrors, dual-zone air conditioning with micron air filter and solar sensor, UConnect 276-watt AM/FM/CD/MP3 player with six Boston Acoustics speakers, Sirius satellite radio, Bluetooth streaming audio, steering navigation system, hand-free communication, cruise control, UConnect information display, tilt steering wheel, leather seats, power front seats, heated front seats, auto headlights, dual front air bags, dual front side air bags, side curtain air bags, Anti-lock Braking (ABS), Electronic Stability Control, Tire Pressure Monitoring system, ParkSense rear parking assist system